GamePP Frequently Asked Questions - Professional Hardware Monitoring Software FAQ Knowledge Base

The moment I tried to touch down on a new planet, the screen would just freeze for a solid 2 seconds. That kind of memory overflow lag is an absolute nightmare for any serious player. With G.Skill Trident Z DDR4 3200 8GB, the physical capacity is just too small for a memory-hog like Starfield; my usage hit 98% instantly, forcing the system to lean on painfully slow virtual memory. I initially tried to cap the game's memory usage via the registry, but that was a disaster—the game just crashed at the loading screen, leaving me completely baffled. I eventually manually set the virtual memory to a fixed 16GB and moved it to a dedicated partition on my high-speed NVMe SSD. Checking the monitoring panel, the frame time jumps of 40-120ms finally settled down to 18-25ms. It's not perfect, but at least it doesn't lock up anymore. Interestingly, my boot time actually slowed down when I first set the fixed size, and it didn't go back to normal until I killed the Superfetch/SysMain indexing service. Now, my RAM temps stay between 42-48℃ with response latency sitting at 68-75ns. Performance tools confirm the resource allocation is finally sane, keeping frame times steady at 18-25ms. Last updated onFebruary 9, 2026 3:18 PM.

Every time my car hits complex terrain, the CPU load spikes and the game hitches. It's such a basic scheduling issue that it's almost laughable. Even with a top-tier cooler like the NH-D15 G2, my motherboard had a 0.08V vdroop during 250W spikes, triggering a brief frequency protection event. I tried 'Ultimate Performance' mode in Windows, but that just pushed the CPU to 92℃ and caused thermal throttling—completely the wrong move. I went into the BIOS, set the Load-Line Calibration (LLC) to Mode 4, and bumped the core voltage to 1.28V to offset the drop. In Cinebench R23, my multi-core score went up by 300 points and the temp curve became a flat line. I actually had a boot failure on my first attempt with Mode 4, but backing off the offset by 0.01V made it perfectly stable. CPU temps now sit at 72-78℃ and the fans are barely audible. Backed up the BIOS profile and I'm good to go. Last updated onApril 1, 2026 10:53 AM.

In the middle of a massive firefight, my CPU temps would slowly but surely climb from 70℃ to 95℃, which dragged my clocks down from 4.8GHz to a pathetic 3.2GHz. The CR-1400 is a small cooler, and it just hits heat soak too fast under sustained load, losing about 20% efficiency after 40 minutes. I tried blasting all my case fans at 100%, but that only dropped the ambient temp by 2℃ while the core kept climbing—it was a pretty hopeless feeling. I eventually went into the BIOS and changed the fan curve from linear to exponential, forcing 100% output above 80℃, and optimized the rear exhaust. HWMonitor shows the core now stabilizes between 82-88℃ without hitting the throttle point. The fans were oscillating wildly at 75℃ at first, but adding a 3-second hysteresis timer smoothed it out. CPU power stays around 95-110W, which is the limit for this cooler. Last updated onMarch 16, 2026 9:02 PM.

When the screen fills up with flashy skill effects, the combat feels amazing—until the lag hits. The Cooler Master B240 had a PWM response delay of 180-220ms during these power bursts, which sent my core temps from 55℃ to 92℃ in literally one second. I tried a power-saving mode in the drivers, but that just slowed down my loading times by 10% while only dropping temps by 3℃, which was a total waste of time. I went into the BIOS and flipped the pump from 'Smart' to 'Full Speed' and moved the radiator fan trigger to 45℃. Using RivaTuner, the frame times tightened up from 22-40ms to a consistent 14-18ms, and the stuttering just vanished. The pump had a high-pitched whine at first, but a custom silent curve for the radiator fans balanced it out. CPU temps now sit steady at 64-70℃. It's a night and day difference. Last updated onMarch 16, 2026 7:42 PM.

This cooler felt like it was giving up on my CPU, with temps just screaming toward 100℃. The RT620P hit a thermal saturation point under sustained load, and the heat pipe efficiency dropped by about 15% after 30 minutes, leaving the core stuck between 94-99℃. I tried the 'brute force' method of ripping the side panel off my case, which dropped temps by 5℃ but let in a mountain of dust—totally ridiculous. I ended up redesigning the case airflow, switching the front fans to a positive pressure setup and locking the RT620P fans to 100% once it hits 85℃. In AIDA64 stress tests, the core temp dropped from 97℃ to a more manageable 86-89℃, and the lowest frame dips improved by 30%. I had some annoying fan resonance at first, but dialing back the top exhaust by 200 RPM sorted it. CPU power stayed at 140-155W. Exported the logs and it's finally stable. Last updated onMarch 10, 2026 3:36 PM.

Back to Top