Baseline Frequency Config Performance Difference Comparison

Launch the comparison benchmark and select multi-config parallel mode—add the 3200 preset alongside faster ones. Hit run—the standardized path starts, FPS and loading timer refresh together at the bottom. The 3200 kit holds playable average frame rates; 1% Lows sit slightly below high-speed groups but variation stays controlled. Loading time bars show the 3200 config taking a few extra seconds, yet the gap isn’t large enough to disrupt flow. Flip to the detailed stats page—scan across the three key metrics: 3200 stays closest to high-frequency in light scenes, while 1% Low delta grows under heavy load. Final summary percentages appear: faster memory improves complex-scene smoothness by roughly 11.3% and loading by about 18.6%. The whole comparison is straightforward and revealing—3200 remains perfectly viable on a budget for daily play, while higher speeds deliver a clear qualitative leap.
Category:Performance Evaluation Last updated:March 11, 2026 1:05 PM